Dexter Shoes Case Study Featured Image

Case Study: Dexter Shoes — Warren Buffett’s Worst Investment

Even the best investors make mistakes.

Warren Buffett has called his investment in Dexter Shoes:

“The worst deal I’ve ever made.”

At first, Dexter looked like a great business.

But over time, it became completely worthless.

In this case study, you’ll learn:

  • Why Buffett invested in Dexter Shoes
  • What went wrong
  • The key mistakes
  • How to avoid similar failures

The Investment: What Happened?

In 1993, Berkshire Hathaway acquired Dexter Shoes.

  • Purchase price: ~$433 million
  • Payment: Berkshire stock (not cash)

At the time:

  • Dexter was a leading U.S. shoe manufacturer
  • It had strong profits
  • It appeared to have a competitive advantage

On the surface, it looked like a great investment.

Why Buffett Invested

Buffett believed Dexter had:

  • A strong brand
  • Consistent earnings
  • A durable position in its market

This aligned with his framework:

  • Understandable business
  • Good financial performance

But one critical factor was misunderstood…

What Went Wrong

The core problem:

Dexter did NOT have a durable competitive advantage.

Key Issues:

1. No True Moat

Dexter’s products were easy to replicate.

Competitors—especially overseas manufacturers—could produce shoes cheaper.

2. Global Competition

Foreign companies entered the market with lower costs.

Dexter couldn’t compete on price.

3. Declining Economics

Margins shrank.
Profits disappeared.

Eventually, the business became worthless.

The Real Cost of the Mistake

The biggest mistake wasn’t just buying Dexter.

It was how Buffett paid for it.

He used Berkshire Hathaway stock.

Why This Matters:

That stock later became extremely valuable.

Today, Buffett has said the real cost of the deal is tens of billions of dollars.

Where the Framework Broke

Dexter failed one critical test:

competitive advantage comparison apple vs dexter

This shows:

A business can look strong—but without a moat, it won’t last.

Key Lessons from Dexter Shoes

1. A Good Business Isn’t Always a Great Investment

Strong earnings alone are not enough.

2. Competitive Advantage Is Critical

Without a moat, profits disappear over time.

Competitive Advantage Explained

3. Global Competition Matters

Industries with low barriers to entry are risky.

4. Capital Allocation Is Crucial

How you invest—and what you pay with—matters.

5. Even Great Investors Make Mistakes

The key is learning from them.

What Buffett Learned

Buffett has openly reflected on this mistake.

The lesson:

Focus even more on durable competitive advantage

After Dexter, Buffett shifted further toward:

  • High-quality businesses
  • Strong moats
  • Long-term dominance

How to Avoid This Mistake

Before investing, ask:

  • Does this business have a durable advantage?
  • Can competitors easily replicate it?
  • Is pricing power strong?
  • Will this business still be strong in 10–20 years?

If the answer is unclear, be cautious.

How This Fits Into Fundamental Investing

Dexter Shoes shows why fundamental investing matters.

Fundamental investing focuses on:

  • Business quality
  • Competitive advantage
  • Long-term value

Buffett’s mistake highlights:

If you ignore these factors, even “good” businesses can fail.

build your investing skills

Learn From Both Success and Failure

Apple shows what great investments look like.
Dexter shows what to avoid.

Follow our step-by-step learning path to build a complete investing framework.

Frequently Asked Questions

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Fundamental Investing Institute
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.